Pypo.ai logoPypo.ai

    Respond to online defamation

    Defamation is jurisdictionally sensitive. Pypo picks the right escalating instrument — correction request, editorial complaint, press council complaint, or pre-litigation letter — based on the source type, the jurisdiction, and the severity.

    Why Pypo fits this case

    • Distinguishes news outlets from social posts from user-generated sites — vocabulary, recipient, and remedy change accordingly (Truth-Over-Template).
    • Drafts correction requests, editorial complaints, press-council complaints, and pre-litigation letters in the correct order.
    • Tracks responses and surfaces escalation paths.
    • Evidence Pack ready for an attorney if escalation becomes litigation.

    How it works

    1. 1

      Identify the source type

      News outlet, social post, blog, forum — different paths.

    2. 2

      Pick the right instrument

      Correction, complaint, pre-litigation — chosen per jurisdiction and source.

    3. 3

      Send and track

      Pypo routes the right recipient and watches for the reply.

    4. 4

      Escalate appropriately

      Press council, regulator, or pre-litigation handoff to an attorney.

    What backs this up

    • Truth-Over-Template: a news article will not be hit with a 'disable your account' demand and a social post will not be hit with a press-council complaint.
    • Pre-litigation letters are clearly labeled as such; Pypo is not a law firm and notes when an attorney is the right next step.

    Jurisdictions covered: US, EU, UK, CA, AU.

    FAQ

    Is Pypo a law firm?

    No. For active litigation, hire a qualified attorney. Pypo's Evidence Pack is designed to hand off cleanly.

    What if the defamer is anonymous?

    Pypo can target the host, the registrar, and the platform's identity-disclosure process where applicable.

    Related

    Ready to start?

    Free tier is ad-supported. You can start your case in minutes.

    Start with Pypo